如果您遇到婚姻问题,感情纠纷需要调解咨询或需要律师服务,可以与我们取得联系。妙合科技

妙君婚姻家庭法律咨询网

婚前赠与对方存折,婚后未支取,离婚时应当归谁所有

2022年1月4日 04:48| 发布者:妙君小编| 查看:33| 评论:0|来自:网络

摘要:婚前赠与对方存折,婚后未支取,离婚时应当归谁所有婚前赠与对方存折,婚后未支取,离婚时应当归谁所有原告刘小红与被告张广于2004年经人介绍相识,建立恋爱关系。在结婚前被告张广将一张5000元定期存折交给了

婚前赠与对方存折,婚后未支取,仳离时该当归谁一切

被告刘小红与被告张广于2004 年经人先容了解,建立恋爱关系。在成婚前被告张广将一张5000元定期存折交给了刘小红,说是将这笔钱赠与给被告刘小红。刘小红也怅然接收。存折上存款人的姓名是张广,那时,张广没有告诉刘小红这份存折的密码。未几,二人便停止了成婚挂号,举行了成婚仪式,起头配合生活。成婚后配合生活的时代,被告刘小红始终没有支取这笔钱。成婚几个月后,双方的豪情便出现裂缝,被告刘小红向法院起诉与被告仳离,并要求将存折衷5000元钱判归被告一切。

法庭审理

由于双方对其他财富归属没有争议。所以本案争议的焦点是,被告张广在婚前将5000元的存折赠与给被告刘小红,这一赠与行为能否依法建立。

被告律师以为,本案赠与条约建立。首先、被告已经对被告实施了赠与财富的行为。被告也停止了接收,而且始终保管着该存折。虽然存折上存款人的姓名是张广,没有变更加被告,而且被告也始终未将存折衷的5000 元钱提出利用。但这些缘由都不影响被告对该金钱的获得。由于存亏本自己便包括了5000元的财富权利。其次、被告与被告双方在实施赠与行为时,双方的意义暗示是实在的。被告张广是自愿地将包括5000元钱的存折赠与给被告刘小红,被告刘小红也是明白暗示赞成接收5000元钱。《中华群众共和百姓法公例》第五十五条规定:民事法令行为该当具有以下条件:(一)、行为人具有响应的行为才能;(二)、意义暗示实在;(三)、不违反法令和社会公共好处。被告与被告双方实施的赠与行为完全合适民事法令行为所该当具有的条件。所以双方的赠与行为依法建立。

本律师作为被告代理人,本律师以为本案赠与条约不建立。由于存折只是一个权利凭据,其自己并不包括代价,比如说,存折丧失了可以停止挂失然后补发新的存折。所以,本案被告张广赠与给被告刘小红的只是一份权利凭据即存折。而存折衷所包括的本色财富权利并没有发生转移。而且存折的权利人名字还是被告,所以被告可以撤消赠与。《中华群众共和国条约法》第一百八十六条规定:赠与人在赠与财富的权利转移之前可以撤消赠与。 具有救灾、扶贫等社会公益、道德义务性质的赠与条约大概经过公证的赠与条约,不适用前款规定。按照该条规定,被告张广与被告刘小红之间的赠与行为不具有 救灾、扶贫等社会公益、道德义务性质,所以,被告可以撤消赠与。

法庭判决

法庭判决支持了本律师的概念。判决本案赠与条约没有实行,被告有权撤消。最初判决采纳被告请求返还5000元的诉讼请求。判决双方仳离。

Before marriage bankbook of donative the other side, after marriage not draw money, who ought to return when the divorce all

Accuser Liu Xiaogong and the accused Zhang An were acquainted via person introduction 2004, establish amative relationship. In the accused before marrying Zhang An general a piece 5000 yuan of fixed bankbook gave Liu Xiaogong, saying is this money donative give accuser Liu Xiaogong. Liu Xiaogong also is received willingly. The full name of the depositor on bankbook is Zhang An, at that time, zhang An did not tell Liu Xiaogong the password of this bankbook. Before long, 2 people undertook conjugal registering, hold finish marriage ceremony, begin collective life. After marrying, live jointly during, accuser Liu Xiaogong does not have draw money from beginning to end this money. Marry after a few months, bilateral feeling appears crack, accuser Liu Xiaogong is sued to the court divorce with the accused, ask to sentence 5000 yuan of money in bankbook put in accuser 's charge all.

Judicial cognizance

Because both sides is attributive to other property,do not have controversy. So the focus of this case controversy is, the accused Zhang An is before marriage the bankbook 5000 yuan is donative give accuser Liu Xiaogong, whether does this one donative behavior hold water lawfully.

Plaintiff attorney thinks, donative contract establishs this record. Above all, the behavior that the accused had carried out donative belongings to accuser. Accuser also undertook reception, and keeping from beginning to end this bankbook. Although the full name of the depositor on bankbook is Zhang An, it is accuser without change, and accuser also will not put 5000 yuan of eclectic money from beginning to end put forward to use. But these reasons do not affect the accuser taking to this money. Because put itself of lose money in business,included 5000 yuan property right. Next, accuser and the accused both sides are in when carrying out donative behavior, it is true that bilateral meaning expresses. The accused Zhang An is the deposit book that will include 5000 yuan of fund of one's own accord donative give accuser Liu Xiaogong, accuser Liu Xiaogong also is to express clearly to agree to receive 5000 yuan of fund. " general rule of civil code of People's Republic of China " fiftieth 5 regulations: Civil law action ought to have following requirement: (one) , behavior person has corresponding behavior capacity; (2) , the meaning expresses true; (3) , not lawbreaking with the society public interest. The donative behavior that accuser and the accused both sides carry out accords with the requirement that place of civil law action ought to have completely. So bilateral donative behavior holds water lawfully.

This lawyer regards the accused as agent, this lawyer thinks donative contract does not establish this record. Because bankbook is proof of a right only, its itself does not include value, e.g. , bankbook was lost can undertake report the loss of sth reissues next new deposit book. So, this case the accused Zhang Anzeng and those who give accuser Liu Xiaogong is proof of a right only namely bankbook. And the substantial property right that includes in bankbook did not produce move. And the obligee name of bankbook still is the accused, the accused is so OK cancel is donative. " contract law of People's Republic of China " the 186th regulation: Donative person is OK before the right of donative belongings is transferred cancel is donative. Provide the calamity of can be saved, donative contract that helps quality of obligation of the social commonweal such as deficient, morality to perhaps pass notarial donative contract, unwell provision of the section before using. According to this regulation, the donative behavior between the accused Zhang An and accuser Liu Xiaogong does not provide calamity of can be saved, help quality of obligation of the social commonweal such as deficient, morality, so, the accused is OK cancel is donative.

Judicial court decision

The court adjudicates the point of view that supported this lawyer. Adjudicate donative contract did not fulfill this case, the accused has authority cancel. Final court decision rejects accuser to request to return the litigant request that returns 5000 yuan. Adjudicate bilateral divorce.

其他文章

  • 法律咨询解答:离婚房产分割

    法律咨询解答:离婚房产分割离婚房产分割你好!我是05年结婚,婚前丈夫全款买了一套经济适用房,06年丈夫给我写了一份协议,内容是****房子归***人所有(产权)居住权,然后他自己签名,写了日期.现在我们协议离婚

    2022-01-03 23:15
  • 妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网法律咨询:结婚登记需要携带什么

    妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网法律咨询:结婚登记需要携带什么妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网网友问:我老公是中国人在日本定居12年了国籍还是中国我是中国人我门登记应该带什么妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网律师解答:具体的政策可以到 ...

    2022-01-03 21:01
  • 妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网法律咨询:离婚财产

    妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网法律咨询:离婚财产妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网网友问:离婚后又把房子买在一起/现在没钱自病怎么办。妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网律师解答:咨询内容不清楚,如果是区同买的房,那么可以卖房子来治病。 ...

    2021-12-30 23:38
  • 妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网法律咨询:计划生育接受函

    妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网法律咨询:计划生育接受函妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网网友问:我一女同事要迁出户口,现户口所在地计生部门要迁入地的计划生育接受函,迁入第说没有,该怎么办妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网律师解答:到 ...

    2021-12-30 20:55
  • 妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网法律咨询:是否2009年4月1日起个人不准收养孩子

    妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网法律咨询:是否2009年4月1日起个人不准收养孩子妙君婚姻家庭律师咨询网网友问:我夫妇二人结婚数年无子女,夫现年41岁,妻现年37岁,想收养一名民间弃婴,在咨询民政局时,被告知,从2009年4月 ...

    2021-12-30 16:07